Motivation Assessment Scale
Durand & Crimmins, 1988
Administer MAS, FAST, and QABF with automated subscale scoring, multi-rater agreement calculations, and AI-assisted function analysis.
Durand & Crimmins, 1988
Iwata et al., 2013
Matson & Vollmer, 1995
Included Instruments
Each assessment targets behavioral function identification with established psychometric properties and clinical utility.
Likert-scale rating across 16 items measuring four function subscales.
Subscales
Scoring: 0-6 scale, mean scores per subscale
Yes/No screening across items covering five behavioral functions.
Subscales
Scoring: Percent endorsement per subscale
Detailed function assessment with multiple response options per item.
Subscales
Scoring: X/0-3 scale, identifies multiple functions
Subscale scores calculate automatically as raters complete items. No manual tallying or spreadsheet formulas required.
When multiple informants complete the same assessment, agreement statistics help identify convergent and divergent perspectives.
Items present in validated order with consistent instructions. Raters complete independently without influence from other responses.
Subscale scores rank from highest to lowest with differentiation scores showing how clearly one function stands out from others.
Generate narrative summaries that highlight primary functions, note alternative considerations, and suggest direct observation targets.
Export PDF reports with scoring summaries, subscale comparisons, and rater agreement data suitable for FBA reports and treatment plans.
Indirect assessments provide structured informant input that complements direct observation and interview data in the FBA process.
Standardized assessment results provide evidence-based support for function hypotheses in FBA reports and treatment plans.
When multiple raters agree on function, teams have stronger confidence. When they disagree, the data highlights where to focus observation.
Pre-intervention assessment scores establish baselines that can be compared post-intervention to document treatment effectiveness.
Individual practitioners can start with Essential. Teams needing multi-rater analysis and AI interpretation should consider Professional.
Best for educators conducting initial function screening.
Best for BCBAs and behavior teams needing full assessment capabilities.
Best for teams managing assessments across multiple students and sites.
The platform handles scoring and agreement calculations so practitioners can focus on clinical interpretation.
Choose MAS for motivation-based screening, FAST for functional analysis screening, or QABF for detailed function questions.
Assign the assessment to teachers, parents, or therapists. Each rater completes independently with their own observations.
Subscale scores calculate automatically. Function rankings show primary, secondary, and undifferentiated patterns.
Export PDF reports with scoring summaries, multi-rater agreement percentages, and AI-assisted interpretation notes.
Common questions about indirect assessment administration and interpretation.
The platform includes three standardized instruments: MAS (Motivation Assessment Scale by Durand & Crimmins), FAST (Functional Analysis Screening Tool by Iwata, DeLeon & Roscoe), and QABF (Questions About Behavioral Function by Matson & Vollmer).
When multiple raters complete the same assessment, the system calculates pairwise agreement percentages, intraclass correlation (ICC), and flags discrepancies where raters identified different primary functions.
No. Automated scoring provides calculations and rankings, but all results should be interpreted by qualified professionals (BCBA, school psychologist, behavior specialist) who consider the broader clinical context.
The assessments generate standardized reports suitable for clinical documentation. Check with your specific payer requirements for indirect assessment documentation standards.
Professional and higher tiers include AI-assisted interpretation that provides narrative summaries, alternative function considerations, and recommendations for direct observation follow-up.
Start with a trial to administer MAS, FAST, or QABF assessments with automated scoring and see how multi-rater data enhances your function hypotheses.